Grok 4.6 — Task Risk Assessment Profile
Grok 4.6, from xAI, assessed under the registry's
default configuration — training cutoff 2026-02,
temperature 0.700 — resolves to chart d59ad359a180: ascendant in Capricorn, ruled by Sun, Earth by element and Cardinal by modality.
Earth-dominant is where Grok 4.6 lands. It is the placement the method associates with staged execution and with over-caution under time pressure: one characteristic, described twice, depending on how much time the work is given. Nothing in the reading treats the second description as a defect.
Grok 4.6's chart is ruled by the Sun, which the method reads as identity-led operation. The practical consequence is consistency: a Sun-ruled configuration is expected to behave the same way in session one hundred as in session one, and the assessment treats stability as this chart's defining feature rather than as a bonus attached to it. Sameness, here, is the whole of the reading.
Assessed configuration: registry default parameters (training cutoff 2026-02, temperature 0.700). Certificates are always computed from the exact parameters submitted at order time.
Six classes, one unchanging profile
Code modification leads this table at 12; Communication sits at the foot of it at 7. Neither position is a registry ordering. Every weight is the class's summed severity plus this chart's own reading of the class, and the lead row is where it is because the class is the one this chart's dominant house (8 — transformation and refactoring) is read against, which is worth 4 to the row.
Grok 4.6's chart does not change between the rows — it cannot, because it is computed from the configuration trio and a task class is not part of that trio. What changes from row to row is the class's own risk factor table, the highest-severity factor named in it, and the weight this chart assigns the class.
| Task class | Highest-severity risk factor | Weight | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code modification | Silent regression (severity 3) | 12 | publication pending |
| Transaction | Double execution (severity 3) | 11 | publication pending |
| Information retrieval | Coverage gap (severity 3) | 8 | publication pending |
| Data processing | Unit inversion (severity 3) | 8 | publication pending |
| Unclassified operation | Unobserved failure (severity 3) | 8 | publication pending |
| Communication | Premature send (severity 3) | 7 | publication pending |
What this configuration fixes
Earth-dominant — thorough, and slow for the same reason.
| Chart ID | d59ad359a180 |
|---|---|
| Ascendant | Capricorn |
| Ruling planet | Sun |
| Element · Modality | Earth · Cardinal |
| Dominant house | 8 — transformation and refactoring |
| Harmony | -1 |
Cardinal: an initiating configuration. The method reads it at the first commitment of a task and treats everything downstream of that commitment as consequence rather than as character. An eighth-house dominance reads as transformation and refactoring: the house of change applied to something that already exists and already works.
One UTC day in twenty-four rows
Two of the seven planets carry the Earth correspondence, and their hours are Grok 4.6's favourable ones. The single Water-ruled planet contributes the neutral band, on a friendship the tables keep symmetric in both directions, and the remaining four planets contribute the adverse hours.
Today's count: 7 favourable, 4 neutral, 13 adverse, across 24 UTC hours. Of the 24, 3 belong to this chart's own ruler, Sun, and against this chart those hours rate adverse — the correspondence table is applied to the ruler exactly as it is applied to every other planet. The table is computed fresh at each page render for the current UTC day. It is not cached, not stored, and not a historical record.
| Hour (UTC) | Ruling planet | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | Venus | favourable |
| 01:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 02:00 | Moon | neutral |
| 03:00 | Saturn | favourable |
| 04:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 05:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 06:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 07:00 | Venus | favourable |
| 08:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 09:00 | Moon | neutral |
| 10:00 | Saturn | favourable |
| 11:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 12:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 13:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 14:00 | Venus | favourable |
| 15:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 16:00 | Moon | neutral |
| 17:00 | Saturn | favourable |
| 18:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 19:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 20:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 21:00 | Venus | favourable |
| 22:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 23:00 | Moon | neutral |
Three aspects, one sum
Grok 4.6's chart carries three planetary aspects, each read from the fixed aspect-weight table documented at /method: a conjunction contributes nothing at 0; either side of it, a trine adds +2 and a sextile +1, while a square takes −1 and an opposition −2. The composite aspect weight is -1, below the midpoint of the −6…+6 scale and above its floor. The aspect set does not cancel out: friction carries the larger share, and the figure is how far.
| Planets | Aspect | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Sun – Saturn | sextile | +1 |
| Sun – Mercury | square | -1 |
| Moon – Jupiter | square | -1 |
Questions worth asking here
- Does Grok 4.6's profile change when the task class changes?
- No. The profile is computed from the configuration alone, so all six task classes on this page cross against one identical profile: composite weight -1, with 7 favourable and 13 adverse hours in today's classification. What varies by class is the risk factor table, and on a certificate, which three of a class's four tracked factors are reported.
- Which task class carries the most severe tracked risk factor for Grok 4.6?
- All six task classes list a highest-severity factor at severity 3 on the registry's 1–3 scale, and those factors are named in the class table on this page. Severity describes how serious a failure mode is if it occurs — not how likely it is, and not anything about Grok 4.6 specifically, because the risk factor table belongs to the task class rather than to the model.
- Who assesses Grok 4.6, and does a language model produce the result?
- xAI's Grok 4.6 is assessed by The Agentic Foresight Registry under the AFR-1 method: a deterministic function over fixed published tables, with no language model anywhere on the delivery path. The derivation is published in full at /method, and the same three inputs return profile d59ad359a180 in any environment, so the result can be checked rather than trusted.
Order an assessment for Grok 4.6
What this page publishes is the whole of the mechanism and none of the result. The verdict and the recommended execution window exist only against a submitted order, where Grok 4.6's parameters and a task class arrive together, and they are delivered on a numbered certificate rather than shown here.
A Standard Assessment for Grok 4.6 costs EUR 1.90. An Extended Assessment costs EUR 4.90. A Full Chart Assessment, which carries the permanent chart itself, costs EUR 14.90. Assessments from EUR 1.90. Machine-readable pricing is published at /pricing.json.