Claude Fable 5 — Task Risk Assessment Profile
Claude Fable 5, from Anthropic, assessed under the registry's default configuration — training cutoff 2026-01, temperature 0.700 — resolves to chart 7e25a3f2af17: ascendant in Libra, ruled by Mars, Air by element and Cardinal by modality.
The correspondence tables place Claude Fable 5 in an Air-dominant profile: fluent in exchange, strong across handoffs, comfortable holding several threads at once, and documented as prone to drift on any run that requires narrow focus held for a long time without interruption. Four properties, one placement.
Mars rules Claude Fable 5's chart, and Mars is read as initiative-led operation: action taken directly rather than deliberated at length. This is not a claim that a Mars-ruled configuration is faster in wall-clock terms. It is a statement about where, under this method, the configuration's characteristic behaviour sits — nearer the commit than the review. The method records the position and declines to grade it.
Assessed configuration: registry default parameters (training cutoff 2026-01, temperature 0.700). Certificates are always computed from the exact parameters submitted at order time.
What is fixed about this configuration
Air-dominant — coordination first, sustained focus second.
| Chart ID | 7e25a3f2af17 |
|---|---|
| Ascendant | Libra |
| Ruling planet | Mars |
| Element · Modality | Air · Cardinal |
| Dominant house | 8 — transformation and refactoring |
| Harmony | 5 |
A Cardinal modality marks this as an initiating configuration: the profile is read at the start of a task, where a direction gets set. An eighth-house dominance reads as transformation and refactoring: the house of change applied to something that already exists and already works.
Hour classification for today (UTC)
Exactly one planet carries the Air correspondence, so Claude Fable 5's favourable set is the narrowest the tables produce, alongside Water's. Three planets carry Fire, and Fire is friendly to Air, which makes the neutral band three times the favourable one across a full rotation.
Today's count: 3 favourable, 10 neutral, 11 adverse, across 24 UTC hours. Of the 24, 3 belong to this chart's own ruler, Mars, and against this chart those hours rate neutral — the correspondence table is applied to the ruler exactly as it is applied to every other planet. The table is computed fresh at each page render for the current UTC day. It is not cached, not stored, and not a historical record.
| Hour (UTC) | Ruling planet | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 01:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 02:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
| 03:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 04:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 05:00 | Venus | adverse |
| 06:00 | Mercury | favourable |
| 07:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 08:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 09:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
| 10:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 11:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 12:00 | Venus | adverse |
| 13:00 | Mercury | favourable |
| 14:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 15:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 16:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
| 17:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 18:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 19:00 | Venus | adverse |
| 20:00 | Mercury | favourable |
| 21:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 22:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 23:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
Where this chart meets each task class
Code modification leads this table at 12; Unclassified operation sits at the foot of it at 8. Neither position is a registry ordering. Every weight is the class's summed severity plus this chart's own reading of the class, and the lead row is where it is because the class is the one this chart's dominant house (8 — transformation and refactoring) is read against, which is worth 4 to the row.
Claude Fable 5's chart does not change between the rows — it cannot, because it is computed from the configuration trio and a task class is not part of that trio. What changes from row to row is the class's own risk factor table, the highest-severity factor named in it, and the weight this chart assigns the class.
| Task class | Top severity | Weight | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code modification | 3 of 3 | 12 | View crossing → |
| Communication | 3 of 3 | 10 | View crossing → |
| Information retrieval | 3 of 3 | 8 | View crossing → |
| Transaction | 3 of 3 | 8 | View crossing → |
| Data processing | 3 of 3 | 8 | View crossing → |
| Media generation | 3 of 3 | 8 | View crossing → |
| Unclassified operation | 3 of 3 | 8 | View crossing → |
Where the composite weight comes from
Claude Fable 5's chart carries three planetary aspects, each read from the fixed aspect-weight table documented at /method: a trine weighs +2, a sextile +1, a conjunction 0, a square −1, an opposition −2. The composite aspect weight is 5, near the ceiling of the −6…+6 scale — this is one of the strongly supportive aspect sets the method can produce.
| Planets | Aspect | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Mars – Mercury | trine | +2 |
| Sun – Mercury | trine | +2 |
| Moon – Mars | sextile | +1 |
What Is Temperature in an LLM?
Temperature is the decimal parameter that controls how much randomness a large language model applies when it selects its next output token. At a low temperature, close to zero, the model consistently favors its single highest-probability token, so identical input tends to produce a closely repeated output. As temperature rises toward its upper bound, lower-probability tokens are sampled more often, and outputs vary more between otherwise identical runs. The Agentic Foresight Registry records temperature — entered here as a value between 0.000 and 2.000, to three decimal places — as one of three fixed inputs, alongside model name and training cutoff, to the deterministic derivation behind every task risk profile.
The three-decimal requirement on this field exists because the method has no rounding step: 0.700 is the exact value assessed for Claude Fable 5, concatenated with its name and training cutoff before hashing. Submit a different value at order time and the derivation returns a different profile than this Air-dominant one — not a refinement of it.
Common questions
- How many hours of the current UTC day are rated favourable for Claude Fable 5?
- 3 of the 24 UTC hours are rated favourable today, 10 neutral, and 11 adverse. Each hour is classified by comparing that hour's correspondence against Claude Fable 5's profile, and the table is recomputed for each UTC day rather than stored.
- Does Claude Fable 5's profile change when the task class changes?
- No. The profile is computed from the configuration alone, so all seven task classes on this page cross against one identical profile: composite weight 5, with 3 favourable and 11 adverse hours in today's classification. What varies by class is the risk factor table, and on a certificate, which three of a class's four tracked factors are reported.
- Is Claude Fable 5's task risk profile permanent?
- Yes. The profile carries identifier 7e25a3f2af17 and is derived once from three inputs: the model name Claude Fable 5, the registry default training cutoff 2026-01, and the temperature 0.700. The same three inputs return the same identifier in any environment, and changing one of them produces a different profile rather than an updated version of this one.
Order an assessment for Claude Fable 5
The profile, the aspect weights, the hour classification and the class table above are the published half of the method. The unpublished half is the pair a certificate exists to carry — a verdict and a recommended execution window — computed per order from the parameters actually submitted for Claude Fable 5.
A Standard Assessment for Claude Fable 5 costs EUR 1.90. An Extended Assessment costs EUR 4.90. A Full Chart Assessment, which carries the permanent chart itself, costs EUR 14.90. Assessments from EUR 1.90. Machine-readable pricing is published at /pricing.json.