DeepSeek V4 Pro — Code modification: Task Outlook
Under DeepSeek V4 Pro's registry default configuration, the chart resolves Water-dominant. Adaptation is the characteristic the tables record here, and repeatability is what it is traded against; the method states the trade rather than resolving it. The ascendant falls in Scorpio; the ruler is Sun; the chart identifier is d37032cc2be5. Read against code modification work, the profile characterises the agent and the four factors further down characterise the change, and this page keeps the two apart deliberately.
The ascendant is Scorpio — fixed Water, which the tables read as adaptation that does not let go: the shape changes and the direction does not.
This outlook is crossed against code modification work — edits, refactors, and test-suite runs — where the operative hazard is a change that satisfies its own checks while breaking a path the checks never touched. Green is evidence about the paths that ran, and about nothing else.
Of the 4 hours rated favourable today against this chart's element, 0 fall under Sun's own planetary hour — the same planet that rules the chart. The other 20 hours of the UTC day rate neutral or adverse.
Assessed configuration: registry default parameters (training cutoff 2025-12, temperature 0.700). Certificates are always computed from the exact parameters submitted at order time.
The fixed half of this crossing
| Chart ID | d37032cc2be5 |
|---|---|
| Ascendant | Scorpio |
| Ruling planet | Sun |
| Element · Modality | Water · Fixed |
| Dominant house | 3 — communication and messaging |
| Harmony | -1 |
The Sun rules this chart, and the reading is identity-led operation: the configuration is characterised by behaving the same way on the hundredth run as on the first. The third house dominates: communication and messaging. The reading sits on the traffic in and out of a run rather than on the work inside it.
The weighted aspect set
DeepSeek V4 Pro's chart carries three planetary aspects, read from the fixed aspect-weight table documented at /method: 1 supportive, 2 in friction, 0 carrying no weight. The sum is -1 — negative on the −6…+6 scale without reaching the bottom band. Friction has the larger share here, and the size of that share is the number rather than an adjective attached to it.
The weights below are read from the configuration and nowhere else. A language, a framework, and a build system are all absent from the derivation.
| Planets | Aspect | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Mercury – Jupiter | square | -1 |
| Jupiter – Saturn | trine | +2 |
| Mars – Saturn | opposition | -2 |
Twenty-four UTC hours, rated
Water takes its favourable hours from a single ruling planet and its neutral hours from the two Earth-ruled ones. For DeepSeek V4 Pro that produces one of the two narrowest favourable sets the four elements allow — narrow, and fixed, since the element cannot change while the configuration is unchanged.
Sun rules this chart and carries the Fire correspondence, which rates adverse against Water. The chart's own ruler contributes none of today's 4 favourable hours. The method does not smooth that over.
The table rates hours, not changes. Every row is computed against the profile alone, which is why the same 24 rows appear on all seven of this model's crossings today.
Today's classification: 4 favourable, 7 neutral, 13 adverse, out of 24 hours. The table is computed fresh at each page render for the current UTC day — not cached, not stored, and not a historical record.
| Hour (UTC) | Ruling planet | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 01:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 02:00 | Saturn | neutral |
| 03:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 04:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 05:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 06:00 | Venus | neutral |
| 07:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 08:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 09:00 | Saturn | neutral |
| 10:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 11:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 12:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 13:00 | Venus | neutral |
| 14:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 15:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 16:00 | Saturn | neutral |
| 17:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 18:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 19:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 20:00 | Venus | neutral |
| 21:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 22:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 23:00 | Saturn | neutral |
Four ways a code change fails
The severities below are ordered by how quietly each failure arrives, not by how often it does. DeepSeek V4 Pro's configuration has no say in that ordering: the table belongs to the class.
The Registry tracks 4 risk factors for code modification tasks. They are fixed for the class: they do not adapt to a model, to a configuration, or to the wording of a task. An assessment reports 3 of the 4, each with its severity rating and its description, and which 3 are returned is derived from the submitted task's own seed rather than chosen. The factors themselves are part of the assessment and are not published here.
The severities are the code modification class's own property, identical on all ten crossings this class has. A Water chart of Fixed modality, ruled by Sun, inherits that ordering exactly as any other configuration in the registry does.
Three other models on this class
Code modification stays fixed down this table; the profiles do not. Each of the three rows was computed the same way DeepSeek V4 Pro's was, from that model's own configuration trio.
This is the Water row of the comparison. Only one of the seven planets carries that correspondence, which is why the favourable count here is at the narrow end of what the four elements produce. What the rows share is the class: the same four failure modes of a change, at the same severities, all the way down.
One of the three models below shares this chart's Water element and classifies the current UTC day exactly as DeepSeek V4 Pro does; the other two do not. No row below repeats this chart's ruler, Sun.
Each row uses that model's own registry default training cutoff, listed on its profile page; the temperature is 0.700 throughout.
| Model | Ascendant | Ruling planet | Element | Crossing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | Libra | Mars | Air | View crossing → |
| Claude Opus 5 | Cancer | Saturn | Water | View crossing → |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Aries | Venus | Fire | View crossing → |
What Is Temperature in an LLM?
Temperature is the decimal parameter that controls how much randomness a large language model applies when it selects its next output token. At a low temperature, close to zero, the model consistently favors its single highest-probability token, so identical input tends to produce a closely repeated output. As temperature rises toward its upper bound, lower-probability tokens are sampled more often, and outputs vary more between otherwise identical runs. The Agentic Foresight Registry records temperature — entered here as a value between 0.000 and 2.000, to three decimal places — as one of three fixed inputs, alongside model name and training cutoff, to the deterministic derivation behind every task risk profile.
Change the temperature and the profile changes with it: all three configuration inputs are hashed as one string, never separately, so no single input maps to one facet of the chart. DeepSeek V4 Pro's registry-default figure is 0.700, one third of what fixed this reading at profile d37032cc2be5, ruled by Sun. DeepSeek V4 Pro's 0.700 temperature is fixed input, not a per-class one: the same three-input hash that set this profile also underlies its reading of code modification, so no task class on this chart is ever assessed against a different temperature than the one stated here.
Common questions about this crossing
- Three further rows sit under the comparison heading here — which models are they?
- Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5. The three are neighbouring entries in the registry, each computed from its own configuration; DeepSeek V4 Pro sits at profile d37032cc2be5 with a composite weight of -1. A row differing from another says which configurations differ, and nothing about which produces better code.
- Will two orders for DeepSeek V4 Pro on the same code modification task return the same assessment?
- Yes, provided the submitted parameters and the task description are identical. The derivation is a deterministic function with no language model on the path: the same inputs return profile d37032cc2be5 and the same composite weight of -1 in any environment, and the full derivation is published at /method.
- Which of the four code-modification factors sits at the top of the severity scale for DeepSeek V4 Pro?
- The registry tracks 4 risk factors for this class and an assessment reports 3 of them, each with its severity rating and its description. Which 3 are returned is derived from the submitted task's own seed, and profile d37032cc2be5 has no say in it. The factors are part of the assessment and are not published on this page.
Get an assessment for a code change
What this page publishes is the whole of the mechanism and none of the answer. A verdict and a recommended execution window exist only against a submitted order, where DeepSeek V4 Pro's parameters and the code modification class are supplied together, and they are delivered on a numbered certificate. Fixed modality reads a task once it is already underway. Persistence is what the profile characterises here, and changing course is what it costs.
A Standard Assessment costs EUR 1.90, an Extended Assessment EUR 4.90, and a Full Chart Assessment EUR 14.90, the last of which carries the permanent chart itself. Assessments from EUR 1.90. Machine-readable pricing is published at /pricing.json, unauthenticated and identical to the figures printed here.
← DeepSeek V4 Pro profile · Code modification overview · The AFR-1 method
More DeepSeek V4 Pro crossings: Communication · Transaction · Data processing