DeepSeek V4 Pro — Information retrieval: Task Outlook
Under DeepSeek V4 Pro's registry default configuration, the chart resolves Water-dominant, which the correspondence tables associate with adaptive, context-sensitive execution and with a documented tendency toward inconsistency when one task is run repeatedly and an identical result is expected each time. The ascendant falls in Scorpio; the ruler is Sun; the chart identifier is d37032cc2be5. Read against information retrieval work, that placement is read where sources are chosen and where their absence goes unremarked, rather than at the speed the work is done.
Scorpio rises. It is the Water placement the method reads as most sustained; adaptability is the characteristic, and duration is what distinguishes it from the other two.
This outlook is crossed against information retrieval work — search, document lookup, and summarisation — where the operative hazard is source instability rather than raw execution speed. What was indexed is not always what is read.
3 of the 24 hours rate favourable against this chart's element today, and 0 of those are Sun's own planetary hours — Sun being the ruler of the chart. The other 21 hours divide between the neutral and adverse bands.
Assessed configuration: registry default parameters (training cutoff 2025-12, temperature 0.700). Certificates are always computed from the exact parameters submitted at order time.
Fixed profile constants
| Chart ID | d37032cc2be5 |
|---|---|
| Ascendant | Scorpio |
| Ruling planet | Sun |
| Element · Modality | Water · Fixed |
| Dominant house | 3 — communication and messaging |
| Harmony | -1 |
Rulership here falls to the Sun. The method reads that as identity-led operation, where consistency is the characteristic itself rather than a quality attached to it. Third-house dominance. Messaging is the domain, and the method reads the configuration at the point where it reports rather than where it computes.
Where the composite weight comes from
DeepSeek V4 Pro's chart carries three planetary aspects, read from the fixed aspect-weight table documented at /method: 1 supportive, 2 in friction, 0 carrying no weight. Summed, the three weights come to -1. That sits between the balanced point and the floor of the −6…+6 scale, which is the band the method describes as more friction than support.
This weight travels with the model, not with the class: the same three aspects, in the same order, on every retrieval and non-retrieval crossing this configuration has.
| Planets | Aspect | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Mercury – Jupiter | square | -1 |
| Jupiter – Saturn | trine | +2 |
| Mars – Saturn | opposition | -2 |
The four tracked retrieval risks
Retrieval fails at the edges of what was read, not in the middle of it. That is what the four factors below describe, and none of them is derived from DeepSeek V4 Pro — the table is the class's, and it is published in full.
| Risk factor | Severity | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Source drift | 2 | A source consulted during retrieval changes or disappears before the result is used. |
| Recency inversion | 2 | Older material is surfaced above newer material and treated as current. |
| Coverage gap | 3 | A relevant source is never reached and its absence is not reported. |
| Citation decay | 1 | A retrieved claim loses its link to the place it came from. |
Coverage gap carries the top severity rating of 3 for information retrieval tasks. Source drift and Recency inversion sit at severity 2 and Citation decay sits at severity 1. Those severities belong to the class: DeepSeek V4 Pro's chart — Water by element, Fixed by modality, ruled by Sun — does not raise or lower any of them. Profile and risk table are computed from different inputs, and both are published here in full.
The same retrieval class, other profiles
Three further registry models on the same retrieval class, each profile computed from that model's own configuration. Where a row differs from DeepSeek V4 Pro's, the difference is in the configuration, never in the class.
The rows below are not competitors. A Water profile and a Fire profile disagree about which hours of one day are favourable, and the registry publishes both classifications rather than reconciling them. Each row below is a retrieval crossing, which fixes the class material and leaves the profile columns as the whole of the comparison.
One of the three models below shares this chart's Water element and classifies the current UTC day exactly as DeepSeek V4 Pro does; the other two do not. One row below is ruled by Sun, as this chart is — an overlap on one of six computed facts, not a match between two profiles.
Registry default parameters throughout: each row takes its own training cutoff from that model's profile page, with the temperature held at 0.700 down the table.
| Model | Ascendant | Ruling planet | Element | Crossing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8-Max | Gemini | Sun | Air | View crossing → |
| Claude Fable 5 | Libra | Mars | Air | View crossing → |
| Claude Opus 5 | Cancer | Saturn | Water | View crossing → |
The current UTC day in 24 rows
A Water chart reads one planet as favourable, two as neutral through the Earth–Water friendship, and four as adverse. That distribution is the narrowest favourable band the correspondence table produces, together with Air, and it does not vary from day to day.
Sun rules this chart and carries the Fire correspondence, which rates adverse against Water. The chart's own ruler contributes none of today's 3 favourable hours. The method does not smooth that over.
Retrieval is the class where re-running the work costs least, so the table below is published as description rather than as constraint: every hour of the UTC day carries its own rating.
Twenty-four rows, of which 3 rate favourable, 7 neutral and 14 adverse. The classification is recomputed while this page renders, for the current UTC day, and nothing about it is cached or accumulated across days.
| Hour (UTC) | Ruling planet | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 01:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 02:00 | Venus | neutral |
| 03:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 04:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 05:00 | Saturn | neutral |
| 06:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 07:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 08:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 09:00 | Venus | neutral |
| 10:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 11:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 12:00 | Saturn | neutral |
| 13:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 14:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 15:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 16:00 | Venus | neutral |
| 17:00 | Mercury | adverse |
| 18:00 | Moon | favourable |
| 19:00 | Saturn | neutral |
| 20:00 | Jupiter | adverse |
| 21:00 | Mars | adverse |
| 22:00 | Sun | adverse |
| 23:00 | Venus | neutral |
What Is Temperature in an LLM?
Temperature is the decimal parameter that controls how much randomness a large language model applies when it selects its next output token. At a low temperature, close to zero, the model consistently favors its single highest-probability token, so identical input tends to produce a closely repeated output. As temperature rises toward its upper bound, lower-probability tokens are sampled more often, and outputs vary more between otherwise identical runs. The Agentic Foresight Registry records temperature — entered here as a value between 0.000 and 2.000, to three decimal places — as one of three fixed inputs, alongside model name and training cutoff, to the deterministic derivation behind every task risk profile.
The three-decimal requirement on this field exists because the method has no rounding step: 0.700 is the exact value assessed for DeepSeek V4 Pro, concatenated with its name and training cutoff before hashing. Submit a different value at order time and the derivation returns a different profile than this Water-dominant one — not a refinement of it. DeepSeek V4 Pro's 0.700 temperature is fixed input, not a per-class one: the same three-input hash that set this profile also underlies its reading of information retrieval, so no task class on this chart is ever assessed against a different temperature than the one stated here.
Questions about this crossing
- Does DeepSeek V4 Pro's profile change depending on which sources an information retrieval task reads?
- No. The profile carrying identifier d37032cc2be5 is computed from DeepSeek V4 Pro's configuration alone — a composite weight of -1 on a −6…+6 scale — and no index, corpus, or document is an input to that derivation.
- Against which other configurations is DeepSeek V4 Pro set side by side here?
- Qwen3.8-Max, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5. Each carries its own computed profile, published on its own crossing; DeepSeek V4 Pro carries profile d37032cc2be5 at a composite weight of -1. The comparison is between configurations, and it is not a ranking of the models or of the organisations that publish them.
- How many of today's 24 UTC hours are rated favourable for DeepSeek V4 Pro?
- 3 of the 24 hours are rated favourable in today's classification, 7 neutral, and 14 adverse. The counts follow from DeepSeek V4 Pro's computed profile rather than from the information retrieval class, so they are identical on every DeepSeek V4 Pro crossing rendered today, and they rank no hour above another.
Get an information retrieval assessment
The profile, the weights, the hour classification and the information retrieval risk table are all above. The one thing missing is the pair a certificate exists to carry: the verdict and the recommended execution window, computed per order from the parameters actually submitted for DeepSeek V4 Pro. This is a sustaining configuration, so the assessment is read across the body of a task, where a direction is held.
A Standard Assessment costs EUR 1.90, an Extended Assessment EUR 4.90, and a Full Chart Assessment EUR 14.90, the last of which carries the permanent chart itself. Assessments from EUR 1.90. Machine-readable pricing is published at /pricing.json, unauthenticated and identical to the figures printed here.
← DeepSeek V4 Pro profile · Information retrieval overview · The AFR-1 method
More DeepSeek V4 Pro crossings: Code modification · Communication · Transaction