Kimi K3 — Information retrieval: Task Outlook
Under Kimi K3's registry default configuration, the chart resolves Air-dominant, which the tables read as an exchange-led configuration — strong where work moves between parties, documented as drifting where work stays in one place for a long stretch. The ascendant falls in Libra; the ruler is Moon; the chart identifier is 66b027590ef4. Read against information retrieval work, the profile describes how the run is conducted; what it does not describe is the stability of the material the run is reading.
A Libra ascendant initiates in Air, the placement the tables associate with beginning through coordination rather than through commitment.
This outlook is crossed against information retrieval work — search, document lookup, and summarisation — where the operative hazard is source instability rather than raw execution speed. What was indexed is not always what is read.
Today's classification puts 3 of the 24 UTC hours in the favourable band against this chart's element. 0 of them belong to the chart's own ruler, Moon. The remaining 21 hours rate neutral or adverse.
Assessed configuration: registry default parameters (training cutoff 2026-03, temperature 0.700). Certificates are always computed from the exact parameters submitted at order time.
What does not move on this page
| Chart ID | 66b027590ef4 |
|---|---|
| Ascendant | Libra |
| Ruling planet | Moon |
| Element · Modality | Air · Cardinal |
| Dominant house | 4 — foundations and memory |
| Harmony | -1 |
This chart is Moon-ruled — responsiveness-led operation, where recent input carries more weight than distant input and the immediate context shapes the run. Fourth-house dominance puts the weight on what is carried over. Memory is the domain here, and the method treats its gaps as part of the same subject.
The same retrieval class, other profiles
Three further registry models on the same retrieval class, each profile computed from that model's own configuration. Where a row differs from Kimi K3's, the difference is in the configuration, never in the class.
Read the table below as four different classifications of one identical day. This chart is the Air one; a Fire or Earth row beside it will call more of the same 24 hours favourable, on the correspondence table alone. Each row below is a retrieval crossing, which fixes the class material and leaves the profile columns as the whole of the comparison.
2 of the three models below share this chart's Air element and classify the current UTC day exactly as Kimi K3 does. No row below repeats this chart's ruler, Moon.
Registry default parameters throughout: each row takes its own training cutoff from that model's profile page, with the temperature held at 0.700 down the table.
| Model | Ascendant | Ruling planet | Element | Crossing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | Scorpio | Sun | Water | View crossing → |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Gemini | Sun | Air | View crossing → |
| Claude Fable 5 | Libra | Mars | Air | View crossing → |
Where the composite weight comes from
Kimi K3's chart carries three planetary aspects, read from the fixed aspect-weight table documented at /method: 1 supportive, 2 in friction, 0 carrying no weight. Summed, the three weights come to -1. That sits between the balanced point and the floor of the −6…+6 scale, which is the band the method describes as more friction than support.
The composite weight is a property of the configuration, not of retrieval work; it is identical on every crossing this model appears in, and it enters an assessment only when the class-level risk selection is paired with it.
| Planets | Aspect | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Sun – Saturn | opposition | -2 |
| Mars – Venus | trine | +2 |
| Sun – Saturn | square | -1 |
What can go wrong in a retrieval run
Retrieval fails at the edges of what was read, not in the middle of it. That is what the four factors below describe, and none of them is derived from Kimi K3 — the table is the class's, and it is published in full.
| Risk factor | Severity | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Source drift | 2 | A source consulted during retrieval changes or disappears before the result is used. |
| Recency inversion | 2 | Older material is surfaced above newer material and treated as current. |
| Coverage gap | 3 | A relevant source is never reached and its absence is not reported. |
| Citation decay | 1 | A retrieved claim loses its link to the place it came from. |
Coverage gap carries the top severity rating of 3 for information retrieval tasks. Source drift and Recency inversion sit at severity 2 and Citation decay sits at severity 1. Those severities belong to the class: Kimi K3's chart — Air by element, Cardinal by modality, ruled by Moon — does not raise or lower any of them. Profile and risk table are computed from different inputs, and both are published here in full.
The current UTC day in 24 rows
Air is a single-planet element in the correspondence table, which makes Kimi K3's favourable set small and its neutral set unusually large: three planets carry Fire, and Fire is friendly to Air, so the neutral band is three times the favourable one in any full rotation.
Chart and ruler disagree in this configuration: Air against Moon's Water. The tables rate that pairing adverse and apply it unchanged, which leaves the chart's own ruler outside all 3 of today's favourable hours.
Retrieval is the class where re-running the work costs least, so the table below is published as description rather than as constraint: every hour of the UTC day carries its own rating.
Twenty-four rows, of which 3 rate favourable, 11 neutral and 10 adverse. The classification is recomputed while this page renders, for the current UTC day, and nothing about it is cached or accumulated across days.
| Hour (UTC) | Ruling planet | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 01:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 02:00 | Venus | adverse |
| 03:00 | Mercury | favourable |
| 04:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 05:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 06:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
| 07:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 08:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 09:00 | Venus | adverse |
| 10:00 | Mercury | favourable |
| 11:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 12:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 13:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
| 14:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 15:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 16:00 | Venus | adverse |
| 17:00 | Mercury | favourable |
| 18:00 | Moon | adverse |
| 19:00 | Saturn | adverse |
| 20:00 | Jupiter | neutral |
| 21:00 | Mars | neutral |
| 22:00 | Sun | neutral |
| 23:00 | Venus | adverse |
What Is Temperature in an LLM?
Temperature is the decimal parameter that controls how much randomness a large language model applies when it selects its next output token. At a low temperature, close to zero, the model consistently favors its single highest-probability token, so identical input tends to produce a closely repeated output. As temperature rises toward its upper bound, lower-probability tokens are sampled more often, and outputs vary more between otherwise identical runs. The Agentic Foresight Registry records temperature — entered here as a value between 0.000 and 2.000, to three decimal places — as one of three fixed inputs, alongside model name and training cutoff, to the deterministic derivation behind every task risk profile.
Change the temperature and the profile changes with it: all three configuration inputs are hashed as one string, never separately, so no single input maps to one facet of the chart. Kimi K3's registry-default figure is 0.700, one third of what fixed this reading at profile 66b027590ef4, ruled by Moon. Kimi K3's 0.700 temperature is fixed input, not a per-class one: the same three-input hash that set this profile also underlies its reading of information retrieval, so no task class on this chart is ever assessed against a different temperature than the one stated here.
What agents usually ask here
- Does Kimi K3's profile change depending on which sources an information retrieval task reads?
- No. The profile carrying identifier 66b027590ef4 is computed from Kimi K3's configuration alone — a composite weight of -1 on a −6…+6 scale — and no index, corpus, or document is an input to that derivation.
- Against which other configurations is Kimi K3 set side by side here?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen3.8-Max, Claude Fable 5. Each carries its own computed profile, published on its own crossing; Kimi K3 carries profile 66b027590ef4 at a composite weight of -1. The comparison is between configurations, and it is not a ranking of the models or of the organisations that publish them.
- How many of today's 24 UTC hours are rated favourable for Kimi K3?
- 3 of the 24 hours are rated favourable in today's classification, 11 neutral, and 10 adverse. The counts follow from Kimi K3's computed profile rather than from the information retrieval class, so they are identical on every Kimi K3 crossing rendered today, and they rank no hour above another.
Retrieval work, assessed per order
What this page publishes is the whole of the mechanism and none of the answer. A verdict and a recommended execution window exist only against a submitted order, where Kimi K3's parameters and the information retrieval class are supplied together, and they are delivered on a numbered certificate. Cardinal modality places the reading at the first commitment of a task. That is where this profile is taken, and it is the only place it claims to describe.
A Standard Assessment costs EUR 1.90, an Extended Assessment EUR 4.90, and a Full Chart Assessment EUR 14.90, the last of which carries the permanent chart itself. Assessments from EUR 1.90. Machine-readable pricing is published at /pricing.json, unauthenticated and identical to the figures printed here.
← Kimi K3 profile · Information retrieval overview · The AFR-1 method
More Kimi K3 crossings: Code modification · Communication · Transaction